Governments ADMIT That They Carry Out False Flag Terror → Washingtons Blog
Governments ADMIT That They Carry Out False Flag Terror - Washingtons Blog

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Governments ADMIT That They Carry Out False Flag Terror

Forget the claims and allegations that false flag terror - governments attacking people and then blaming others in order to create animosity towards those blamed - has been used throughout history.

This essay will solely discuss government admissions to the use of false flag terror.

For example:

  • A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that - under orders from the chief of the Gestapo - he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson
  • The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950's to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister
  • Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind "evidence" implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this)
  • As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings. Official State Department documents show that - only nine months before - the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. (While the Joint Chiefs of Staff pushed as a serious proposal for Operation Northwoods to be carried out, cooler heads fortunately prevailed; President Kennedy or his Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara apparently vetoed the plan)
  • The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him "to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident", thus framing the ANC for the bombing
  • An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author)
  • Former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Hugh Shelton says that a Clinton cabinet member proposed letting Saddam kill an American pilot as a pretext for war in Iraq (and see this)

  • According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.
  • The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings
  • As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the "war on terror".
  • Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”
  • United Press International reported in June 2005:
    U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.
  • Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers
  • At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence
  • A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat
  • U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then "drop" automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants

There are many other instances of false flag attacks used throughout history proven by the historical evidence. See this, this and this. The above are only some examples of governments admitting to using false flag terror.

You can't call it a conspiracy theory when the government itself admits it.

And this is not just ancient history:

  • Jimmy Carter's former National Security Adviser - Zbigniew Brzezinski - told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation


  1. General Washington,

    Just want to commend you on the clear and thorough work that you do. Very impressive. I request that you post an entry that shows how you compile so much evidence so succinctly so that others may learn from your skills.

    Nice to know that even 211 years after your death you are still fighting for our country.

  2. Look at Iraq, all the bombs in markets, mosques, streets a lot of them without question are US/UK and Israeli explosions. British SAS soldiers were arrested with explosives and surveillance gear, and Arab clothes. The SAS soldiers were caught and impriosned, then the British army busted them out of jail in September 2005.

    As for GLADIO, watch these videos.

    Gladio - The Ring Masters 1 of 5

    Gladio - The Foot Soldiers 1 of 5

    Gladio - The Puppeteers 1 of 5

    9/11 Truther

  3. Divide et impera has always been the strategy.

  4. great post.

    You might enjoy

    Absolute proof of the controlled demolition of WTC7

  5. You're goin to make Glenn Beck cry.

  6. while I think 911 was a classic "false flag" attack the one that blows me away is the Tube and Bus bombing in London on 7/7. Amazingly A guy by the name of Peter Powers (sic) of a company Visor Corp were paid by "unknowns" to conduct a "drill" on the morning of 7/7. The curious part is as Peter Power was being interviewed by the BBC (Live) the news came in about the actual bombing .In Powers words "the hair on my neck is still standing up" because the drill was EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED AND THE TIMING WAS EXACTLY WHAT WAS DRILLED.To this day no one has said who paid for the "drill".There is no way this is a coincidence .

  7. here is a picture of the 2 special ops soldiers that were captured in basra with a car full of bombing equipment, they shot a couple of police while trying to evade capture;

    and on rapidshare;

  8. It would be nice if this were the least of their dastardly deeds. Read Conversations with the Crow, the Final Confessions of Robert Turnbull Crowley, the former head spook of the CIA.

  9. Lets not forget Operation Gladio

  10. The official "story" of 911 is - dead!

    911 Was "Another" Inside Job!

    Suspicious Patriot

  11. First rate piece. Any who cares to inform themselves knows this is happening. You have gathered these together with solid sources. It's damning.

  12. Don't forget the Gulf of Tonkin incident that lead us into full fledged war in Vietnam.

  13. This article, with all commengtary,should be "presented" to Stewart Roads ("Oath Keepers"), and Tony Martinez ("Sons of Liberty Riders"). They have their heads so far in the sand, its a wounder anybody knows where they are. Their only "plus" is that they have a slick "Patriotic" PR "campaign" going on. Just another couple of "feel good" groups that actually do nothing.

  14. Power and Visor Consultants did indeed perform a terror drill on that day. It involved less than a dozen people working in an office on a theoretical table-top paper-based excercise which envisaged several scenarios, one of which was incendiary bomb attacks on underground trains.

    This is what Power has to say about the issue himself, apparently he's fed up with being dragged into the false flag stuff:

    "I rarely respond to allegations that there was a direct connection between an exercise my company was running on 7 July 2005 and the real events that happened that day, but having just seen on You Tube a highly misleading video following a childish stunt against me on 12/12/07 I feel I have little choice but to make three important points:

    First, I chose to meet 2 people that day who requested an interview with me while I was attending a conference in a London hotel. Having shaken their hands and asked where they were from I noticed I was being covertly filmed by one of them who denied it. As it is not possible to have a civilised conversation when deceit from one side was apparent from the outset, I apologised that I could not help in such circumstances and suggested another time perhaps? I then walked back to the conference - suddenly pursued by 2 or 3 shouting people trying to make it appear I was fleeing?

    Second, it's worth reminding some people that the London underground system has so far been the subject of terrorist bombings on 21 occasions, going back to 1885. Also, on the same day as our exercise, a major law firm in the City of London was running an exercise that involved bombs on the underground. A few days before so did a major German bank in London and even the Metropolitan Police. We were not alone.

    Third, our table top exercise was to involve a very small group of crisis managers under test, from a company employing c1000 people. No one was on the streets at all. Just one part of the scenario was similar to IRA incendiary bombs planted on the underground in 1992 to start fires on three underground trains, albeit the locations were by sheer coincidence, more 2005 that 1992. That's not so surprising when we had a limited number of underground lines to choose from, given the location of our client in the centre of London.

    There will be no convincing some very odd people who think actors were on the bus that was actually bombed and the UK Government staged the whole thing on 7/7, the World Trade Centre was pre-wired with explosives on 9/11 and even that tragedy was a US Government setup.

    At a time when this country is under a sustained terrorist threat it makes sense to base any exercise scenario on realism and historical events and in so doing hopefully increase our overall resilience to this threat. Had the odd people I met on 12.12.07 bothered to have a proper conversation with me I would have explained all this to them but fantasists will, no matter what I say, always prefer sensationalism to sense and conspiracy to coincidence.

    Peter Power. Visor Consultants Limited. 15 December 2007"

    There's also this from Mr Power:

  15. Great evidence in this blog. Make sure you keep hard copy (or electronic copy) documentary evidence of all the evidence you cite from various websites. Soon will come the day when you can no longer retrieve this information and it will all vanish - just like the website for Project for a New American Century. I only hope someone made a copy of that website.

  16. I...I am shocked. A government conducting false flag operations? Weren't these people elected to protect us from the evil fascists/communists/islamicists/terrorists/drug dealers? They represent we the people. How could they possibly even think about murdering some of the we the people in order to score political points and maintain power? My faith in the efficacy, omniscience, and omnipotence of government has been shaken to the core! I thought these guys were our friends!

  17. "The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950's to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected president".

    Wrong - because their target (Mossadegh) wasn't president (head of state) and wasn't democratically elected. He had previously been constitutionally appointed Prime Minister (head of government) after democratic elections - but then he had lost his parliamentary base and been constitutionally dismissed, only he had seized power unconstitutionally and dismissed the parliament unconstitutionally instead of allowing further elections. There was nothing democratic about him, and he was certainly never a president.

  18. The USS Liberty was supposed to be a false flag operation. LBJ conspired with Israeli political leaders to have the ship attacked and sunk, with Egypt getting the blame. The inexperienced IAF attacked the ship with napalm, inhumane but ineffective. Israeli torpedo boats fired four torpedos but hit only once. The Liberty crew turned out to be excellent at damage control. The Liberty radio operators managed to call for help through the jamming and despite their antennas being deliberately attacked and destroyed by the IAF. Once it appeared to Israel that help was on the way, the attack became a "mistake".

  19. The U.S. has a lot of dirty laundry, but when it comes to Islamic terrorism, the U.S. didn't create Islam, the Quran, or 1.x billion Muslims, or the Muslim Brotherhood that promotes radical Islam, so let's say they aided or allowed 9/11, who's playing who? Go to school free online with the Historyscoper and master the key facts of Islam and its 1400-year history, to get started click

  20. Damn fine job GW! Thanks for the excellent research!

  21. For a little perspective on Operation Northwoods (the proposed false flag operation against Cuba), just because the plans were darfrted and approved doesn't mean that anyone was necessarily planning to put them in action. In 1930, the Secretary of War and the Secretary of the Navy approved War Plan Red, which called for the invasion of Canada, among other things. Making plans is just something they do, and the fact that plans were made is not evidence that it was ever intended that they actually be implemented.

    On the other hand, the existance of the plan for Operation Northwoods does show that nothing's off the table with those folks.

  22. Lumping all Muslims into the group with the Islamo-terrorists is akin to saying all Christians are members of the KKK. There is a small minority of almost every sector of society that wishes to impose upon others through violent means, does this prove that all humans are evil? I think not.
    Back to the subject of false flag operations, thanks for the great article GW, keep 'em coming. Only through constant prodding shall the sleeping giant be shaken from it's slumber.

  23. Great job at censoring any posts with real facts concerning 911. Your blog is just another gatekeeper waste of bandwidth.

  24. >>Wrong - because Mossadegh wasn't president

    But on On 28 April 1951,he WAS elected prime minister of Iran...

    The government of the United Kingdom invaded Iran in 1941. Mossadegh dared to nationalize this Oil company owned buy government of the United Kingdom.

  25. Dont forget the WW-1 false flag operation with the sinking of the Lisutania. Them dirty Germans sunk a civilian ship.. 82 years later the ship was found off the coast of England. the bow of the ship was blown-outwards, oviously the Nuetral ship was carrying arms to England.

  26. "Wrong - because their target (Mossadegh) wasn't president had lost his parliamentary base and been constitutionally dismissed,"

    Wrong - because Britain invaded and forced Reza Shah from power in 1941.The Americans installed the Shah in 1953 - hardly democratic?

    Here is a coup tmeline:

  27. Also take a look at our complete jailbreaking guide for iPhone 3.1.3 firmware for iPhone 2G, 3G, 3GS and iPod touch 1G/2G using redsn0w 0.9.3, redsn0w 0.9.4, sn0wbreeze,
    [url=]unlock iphone 3g[/url]


    Easter Sunday 4/4 when both factions of the church will celebrate on the same day .. rare ... The entire christian world will be enraged at the false flag ... self inflicted wound by the NWO ... the entire muslim world will be demonized. 3 day weekend in the US ... perfect weather so far ... incredible number of bunker buster bombs send to the island of diego garcia in prep for bombing of Iran. And the start of WWWIII ....

    False flag nuke is from India. The russian bomb has not worked the last several years.

  29. 911 truth movement is only one way to get the word out about this corrupt government of ours.. as you can see, false flags are nothing new.

  30. So meta that I found this by clicking a link that this page links to - crazy. And pasted text in each word for word. I love it.


→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.