Relief Wells Delayed ... New Tests Show "Gap" in Oil "Well Column" Causing Loss of Pressure ... Does the Government Have ANY IDEA What It's Doing? → Washingtons Blog
Relief Wells Delayed ... New Tests Show "Gap" in Oil "Well Column" Causing Loss of Pressure ... Does the Government Have ANY IDEA What It's Doing? - Washingtons Blog

Monday, August 16, 2010

Relief Wells Delayed ... New Tests Show "Gap" in Oil "Well Column" Causing Loss of Pressure ... Does the Government Have ANY IDEA What It's Doing?


An oil and gas industry veteran with 30 years experience who goes by the alias Fishgrease gave a pretty good recap of BP and the government's record of failure in capping the oil well:

  1. BP does a superhuman job of creating conditions favorable to loss of control of what is very possibly the largest well in the history ot the Gulf of Mexico. Result: Blowout. FAIL
  1. For more than a day, BP insists there is no leakage. Result: Wrong. FAIL
  1. BP admits that well is leaking. Says leak is 1000 BOPD. Result: Wrong. FAIL
  1. NOAA, USCG and independent groups say the leak sure looks more like 5000 BOPD. BP says... DEAL! It's 5000 BOPD! How silly of us! Result: Wrong. FAIL

Round about here, BP succumbs to pressure from ... Congress and other groups and begins to release video feeds of that is happening under a mile of Gulf water, at the damaged well.

  1. BP builds a huge metal barn to lower over one of the leaks. Result: G@*!@^$ thing clogs with hydrate ice within seconds. FAIL
  1. BP installs Insertion Tube Technology. Result: Captures a very small and day-by-day-smaller portion of the leak. FAIL
  1. BP tries Diamond Wire Saw Technology to cut the damaged riser off the top of the BOP, leaving a clean even surface to seat a cap. Result: Wire gets stuck. FAIL
  1. BP tries Crunchy... a huge hydraulic Jaws-of-Death to snip the riser. Result: Jagged, bent, uneven surface upon which nothing will seal. FAIL
  1. BP lowers cap #4. Steam Punk fans rejoice! Result: This cap is capturing only a minor fraction of the leak. FAIL
  1. BP is ordered to increase containment capacity by the USCG. Says it will. Doesn't. Starts piping a portion of the leak to the Q4000 where it is all burned, unmeasured. Result: They're capturing or burning an estimated 50% of the leak, when they were ordered to catch it ALL. FAIL
  1. BP is again ordered to increase capture capacity via sternly-worded letter. Finally installs another processing boat. Result: Still not getting much more than 50% of the leak. Makes excuse that there's not enough room in the fucking Gulf of Mexico to park another boat. FAIL
  1. BP installs "Capping Stack Technology" in order to more effectively capture leak. Result: Vented riser immediately freezes off. This is the beginning of the end of capture. FAIL
  1. BP comes up with "Integrity Test Technology" which completely shuts in the well to test its integrity. Result: Works... immediately starts leaking... but does stop the leak. BP keeps moving goal line for integrity downward from 9000 psi to 8000 psi to 7500 psi to whatever the hell pressure they're seeing that day....
  1. ... Well remains shut in. Leaks are nominal but increasing....
  1. BP comes up with "Static Kill Technology" says it can kill well....

Along about here, BP quits releasing data. Video feeds start blacking out and "Rogue ROVs" appear... we can't see the feeds of those. They're assigned to monitor the BOP leaks and anything else BP doesn't want us to see.

  1. "Magic Cement Technology!" BP convinces Government to put the question of total capture and measurement out of the question. All work on containment stops cold. BP pushes a shitload of mud and cement into well. Result: Even though there's no way on God's Green Earth that they could know where the cement goes, they say they successfully cemented the casing... just the casing... not the annulus. News Media interprets this as a complete plugging of the well and questions whether the relief wells are even needed....

But the well is still leaking, now out of a very energetic leak on the bottom flange seal on the FelxJoint. There is still pressure on the BOP because you can't have leaks without pressure. Plugged wells don't LEAK!

  1. BP says they're going to get some pressure readings off the BOP after venting to see if they can establish flow up the annulus... or something. No one can figure out what the hell they're talking about here and they don't elaborate beyond Thad Allen blubbering a bunch of stuff NO ONE understands.... They freeze off their chokes atop the Capping Stack by flowing hydrocarbons through them with a very large pressure drop. ALL feeds showing anything that is going on are blacked out. After promising to release data, BP and Thad Allen.... don't....
Bob Cavnar continues the timeline, bringing us up to date:
Things keep getting curiouser and curiouser with the Well that Won't Die. In his presser this morning, Adm Allen announced that they are still trying to decide what to do about the relief well, the weak components on the old BOP, and how they're going to approach the relief well, which is still just sitting there, a tantilizing 3 1/2 feet from the blowout wellbore. Dithering seems a strong word, but one I'll now use. You'll recall that right after BP started the surprise "well integrity test" back in July, they announced the surprise "static kill", characterizing it as low pressure, low risk, and an effort to "stabilize" the well. They pumped that procedure on August 3rd, and, declaring the well "static", then pumped 500 barrels of cement announcing that the entire job went right down the casing and out into the formation. That was 11 days ago.

Since, BP and Adm Allen raised the ominous possibility that there was something mysterious going on in the annulus, the space between the production casing and the intermediate casing. Adm Allen has gone on and on about 1,000 barrels of oil in the annulus, "near ambient" pressure testing, rising pressure, falling pressure, holding pressure, and bleeding pressure, to the bewilderment of everyone, including me. Kent Wells, the star of the BP "Technical" McBriefing's, where no technical data is provided, and only few questions are taken (notice I didn't say answered), has been AWOL since his last appearance 6 days ago. The purpose of the "new ambient" pressure test is still unclear, but, after being hounded for over a week by the DailyKos Gulf Watchers, the Admiral compelled BP to release the BOP pressure readings, but BP left out basic information like starting point, whether the well is shut in at the surface or seafloor, the fluid in the riser, etc, so the data is pretty much useless, like most other information that's been disclosed.

Today, the Admiral admitted that there were three components in the the BOP stack that is of concern; we know which ones those are, since we've been talking about them for over a month. The weak components are the flex joint, right on top of the old stack, the riser adapter, and what they call the transition spool are all rated below the other components in the stack, between 5,000 psi to 6,000 psi maximum working pressure. In each of these procedures that BP has undertaken, the top kill, the well integrity test, the injectivity tests, and static kill, the pressures that BP announced actually exceeded the rated pressures of at least one of those components. After performing all of these machinations, they are now suddenly concerned about pressure on the BOP, and are actually talking about changing out the entire stack before completing the bottom kill. What?

All of this delay and dithering is confusing, at best. Pulling the stack at this point is even more concerning, especially with drill pipe and God know what all inside, including the casing hanger. Had they followed the original plan of set the capping stack, hooking up the risers that were supposed to be completed in mid-July, and producing the well to the surface while they were killing it from below, all of this new discussion would be moot. This static kill, where they really have no idea where the cement and mud went, has only complicated matters, created more uncertainty, and absolutely more delay.
In addition, Admiral Allen said today that new tests show “gap” in “well column” causing loss of pressure:


Does the government have any idea what it's doing? Does BP?

5 comments:

  1. lying....mucking it up....embarrassing themselves....committing pr faux pas....acting foolish....

    My prediction - until BP and the Govt. starts telling the truth and acting responsibly - it won't be fixed - like an ethical murphy's law or something....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Did I read that Steven Chu is filling out the chorus by granting permission to pump something?
    Should an oil drilling professional of some sort be directing this effort? Someone who would be attentive to unspecified details?

    ReplyDelete
  3. A clear expose of what a colossal C.F. this has been from-the-word-go.

    If I may though, I'd like to clarify a few points. This talk of annular pressures, fluids, etc. is in-applicable.

    While it is true that the Annulus is the open space between the Well Casing and the Production String, in this instance, there can be no such thing. No Production String is existent in the well. There is only the remaining drill pipe hanging from the BOP.

    This well was never "Completed". It was drilled and the Well Casing cemented (the part of the job that didn't go so well!!) in anticipation of being "Completed".

    Maybe the Admiral is referring to the space between the Well Bore and the Well Casing (That part which must be sealed by cement in order to maintain pressure integrity between the formation and the well hardware.)

    It seems more and more likely that well bore integrity (the formation immediately surrounding the casing.) is that which has been compromised particularly at or near surface. If that is the case, and if the damage is low enough down in the well, it may not be possible to achieve enough head pressure by pumping heavy drilling mud from the bottom up to the surface via the relief well to actually 'kill' the well. The fluid will simply bleed off into whatever fissures now exist in the immediately surrounding formation (The original cement's long gone or broken up.).

    IMHO, this is the reason for all the bullshit (bullshit baffles brains!) coming from BP and 'the Admiral'. They have reached the conclusion that this thing 'ain't going to die!'; no matter what!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The entire Gulf oil disaster has not only been mishandled by BP and the government, it has been exacerbated by their clumsy attempts at repairing the well. You had ROVs bumping into and damaging equipment, the fabulous episode of the stuck diamond saw, all the failed top hats and junk shots and top kills.

    The only reason why the well was allegedly capped and no more oil is entering the Gulf and 76% of that which did magically disappeared is because we are too close to the November elections and Obama wants the story disappeared. I have evidence that none of this is true and I captured this evidence from BP's own ROV cameras.

    There are two wells down there, a couple hundred feet apart just as BP applied to drill in their MC252 Initial Exploration Plan. We are only shown one on TV and you can find only video of the one (drilled last year, not this year, as per their Plan) 99.999% of the time on Youtube.

    I found the 0.001% that BP accidentally let run through the live web feed which clearly shows the other well. It's very simple -- match up the coordinates on the ROV feeds to those that the company applied to drill in their Exploration Plan. I explain it all, with videos, still frame grabs and photos of the Plan on my stupid blog that no one ever reads.

    If you want to find out the truth behind the mystery of the well which does not exist but is caught on camera, you can find the evidence here:

    http://jailthebanksters.blogspot.com/2010/08/caught-on-camera-again-non-existent.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. After reviewing the youtube video citing 2 different locations where ROV's are monitoring BOP as detailed on the map for well a and b decided to search for additional videos for confirmation.



    Found several sites with both coords.



    I'll only use X coords, since Y are basically same.



    X=1202514 well b

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9nHYaDXr4M

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=225zHOYM3Ms

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01F-CJ3c4BI



    X=1202803 well a

    http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=alexhiggins732#p/u/112/DAziERZnzx8



    Found many here:



    http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=X2YeZCAMCNC#g/u



    But several sites have both coords.



    Makes me wonder....

    ReplyDelete

→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.